| Међународни научни скуп: СТРАТЕГИЈА ВАСПИТАЊА И ОБРАЗОВАЊА У САВРЕМЕНИМ УСЛОВИМА |
|||||
| ЗР ПИП-17
|
|
CULTURE OF INTERPERSONAL INTERACTION BETWEEN TEACHER AND STUDENT IN CONFLICT SITUATIONS IN SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS
Abstract: The article is devoted to the empirical analysis of the influence of psychological characteristics of the personal teacher on behavior in situations of aggression provocation in institutions of general secondary education of the Republic of Belarus. 388 teachers took part in the survey. The obtained results of the study are described: the hierarchy of types of interpersonal relations regardless of the gender of the teacher; the strength and nature of the correlation relationship for teachers between behavioral and emotional reactions to conflict situations in the educational space and personal characteristics (extroversion, neuroticism, openness to new things, etc.), the type of interpersonal relations, strategies of behavior in conflict.
Keywords: teacher, situations of aggression provocation, teacher’s personality, culture of interpersonal interaction of the teacher.
КУЛЬТУРА МЕЖЛИЧНОСТНОГО ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЯ ПЕДАГОГА И УЧАЩЕГОСЯ В СИТУАЦИЯХ КОНФЛИКТА В УЧРЕЖДЕНИЯХ СРЕДНЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ РЕСПУБЛИКИ БЕЛАРУСЬ
Резюме: Статья посвящена эмпирическому анализу влияния психологических характеристик личностных педагога на поведение в ситуациях провокации агрессии в учреждениях общего среднего образования Республики Беларусь. В опросе приняли участие 388 учителей. Описаны полученные результаты исследования: иерархия типов межличностных отношений вне зависимости от пола педагога; сила и характер корреляционной взаимосвязи для педагогов между поведенческими и эмоциональными реакциями на ситуации конфликта в образовательном пространстве и личностными характеристиками (экстраверсия, нейротизм, открытость к новому и др.), типом межличностных отношений, стратегиями поведения в конфликте.
Ключевые слова: педагог, ситуации провокации агрессии, личность педагога, культура межличностного взаимодействия педагога.
REFERENCES
Berkovits, L. (2001). Aggression: causes, consequences, control. St. Petersburg: Prime-Euroznak.
Bondarenko, A.V. (2015). Psychological and pedagogical interaction of participants in the educational process. Experiment and innovation at school, 5, 42-44.
Dorontsova, O.A. (2016). Interpersonal interaction of subjects of the educational process in the context of the formation of autonomy of adolescents. Pedagogical education in Russia, 2, 137-142.
Dvoinin, M.L.&Muravyov, Yu.B. (1996). Features of pedagogical communication. Psychopedagogy in law enforcement agencies, 2 (4).
Furmanov, I.A. (2007). Aggression and violence: diagnostics, prevention, correction. St. Petersburg: Rech.
Furmanov, I.A. (2016). Social Psychology of Aggression and Violence: Prevention and Correction. Minsk: Publishing Center of BSU.
Grishina, N.V. (2016). Psychology of Conflict. St. Petersburg: PITER.
Kakun, A.V. (2009). Formation of a culture of interpersonal relations in the teaching staff of the school. Moscow: Moscow state ped. university.
Kleptsova, E.Yu. (2013). Types of interpersonal relationships. News of the Samara. Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences,15 (2-2), 382-387.
Kolominsky, Ya.L. (2010). Social psychology of relationships in small groups. A textbook for psychologists, teachers, sociologists. Moscow: AST.
Leontyev, A.A. (1996). Pedagogical communication. Moscow: El-Fa.
Makarov, Yu.V. (2013). Psychological training as a technology.Bulletin of the Russian State
Pedagogical University named after A. I. Herzen, 155, 61-66.
Mokhnar, L.I. (2013). The essence and structure of the culture of interpersonal interaction of cadets of higher educational institutions of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine.Bulletin of Adyghe State University, Series 3: Pedagogy and Psychology, 4 (129), 75-81.
Petrovsky, V.A. (1992). Phenomena of subjectivity in personality development. Samara.
Psychological tests for professionals (2007). Minsk: Sovrem. shk.
Rykova, A.V. (nd) Forms of methodological work with teachers. https://groiro.by .Retrieved March 17, 2025 , from https://groiro.by/files/01030/obj/110/ 16973/doc/formy-metod-rab-s-pedagogami.pdf .
Sobchik, L.N. (1990). Diagnostics of interpersonal relations. Modified version of interpersonal diagnostics of T. Leary.Methodological guide. Retrieved March 09, 2025, from http://www.miu.by/kaf_new/mpp/037.pdf.
Stasilovich, N.S. (2022).The structure of the culture of interpersonal interaction between a teacher and a student in the educational process. I Republican forum of youth: collection. forum materials, 151-152.Minsk: BNTU.
Sysoeva, E.Yu. (2018). Speech aggression of teachers: essence, causes, types, ways to overcome. Bulletin of Samara University. History, pedagogy, philology, 24 (4), 48-53.
Vokueva, A.S.&Nikolaeva, A.A. (2019).On the role of the teacher in the emergence and resolution of conflicts in an educational institution. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 5 (7), 390-394.
Yastrub, O. (2015).The culture of interpersonal interaction as an integral formation of personality. Modern education of Vitebsk region, 2 (8), 9-12.
